There's always space for Womens Rights Activism just like there's space for mens right activism and other special interest groups. This blog-entry is about me questioning the implementation of feminism these days.
Feminism is Hate and Inequality
I believe that feminism is not about equality between men and women, but about female rights only. It's about women having more rights than men, or equal rights as men, but with less obligations. I never heard feminist movements complain if women gained more privileges than men in some field. And then there are hate sites like Jezebel.com. I can't imagine a women who's truly empowered, or has the ability to be so, needs "support" from those kind of websites. Here are a few links which demonstrate the ugly faces of feminism.
Feminism's violent bigots, in response to Warren Farrell's attempt to present a lecture on the growing crisis for boys in public education, as per YouTube's upload comment. The video is somewhat dramatized, but make no mistake, it's not exaggerated. If you like to see the full footage, which I think is far better anyway, then watch this five minute clip: full version of obstructing access.
Let me break it down for you, the reader who may be less informed.
Warren Farrel, A Ph.D , M.A. and B.A. and a champion for Mens Right Activism and former feminist. He visited the University of Toronto to address issues with men and boys in our society. In the video you hear some yelling about him being a rape apologist and upholding a rape culture. These door-blocking students were referring to an out-of-context placed quotes about rape, amongst others. Here's an example, then you be the judge of that: And with the rape, I was showing why the rape statistics are exaggerated, and saying that date rape was much more complex than the way feminists had portrayed it, as men oppressing women.
You will notice that putting things out of context is one of the modus operandi of feminist groups. For Farrel's response, see this link. I could go on forever about this, but let me wrap it up with two more links so you can decide for yourself on what the heck is going on in this world:
Now compare with this link and you tell me if you really think it's a genuine response: The University of Toronto Student's Union (UTSU) published a response to the protest here: http://utsu.ca/content/3316
The UTSU's response, to their obstructing of the entrance, starts off emotionally charged by stating: "On November 16, 2012 a group at the University of Toronto hosted an event on campus which would supposedly address issues that men and boys face in our society."
Now what else would Dr. Farrel do other than having his speech? It's what he does all the time. He's having speeches, is a tutor and organizes workshops. In fact, looking at this resume, the man has an impressive record.
OK, enough of this. On to the next link.
A self proclaimed professional feminist. She said so in the video. The guy presents a lot of statistics, and how does this professional feminist respond? She admits she doesn't care about the statistics. Like she says in the video, she leaves the statistics up to others. The very first question one may ask does she presents her "facts" if she's not interested in statistics? If you can, watch the whole video an dfind out how: by appeals to emotion and a few other cheap tactics, which are called fallacies. For the full break down of what went down see this link: UCL debate on MRM.
Just about everything stereotypical feminist-like happens, including somebody calling "rape" in the midst of all that. Crying "rape" is a major modus operandi of feminists. There's almost no discussion possible without some feminist crying rape. No man wants to be associated with that, so feminists use it as a way to weaken men by making them feel uncomfortable. You don't have to believe me, all I ask is to open your eyes. You'll see.
Cisca Dresselhuys, once the head editor of Dutch feminist magazine "Opzij" (Dutch wordplay on "move aside / for her"). She refused male employers in the company. Offcourse, all references on their website about this case has been removed: C.D.'s response for refusing men as employees
I guess it's cool to be a male feminist but they cannot pluck the fruits, like working for a feminist magazine. Right.
Or how about French feminist movement outrage when the name of the false accuser of Strauss-kahn was made publicly known. (Nafissatou Diallo) Blind love for women. That's what counts for them.
I could post endless links like these. Feel free to try it yourself. Once you're warmed up an entirely new world will open up for you.
OK, let's demonstrate double standards.
Did you read it? What odd thing did you notice? Parents feel sympathy for that woman! Ever heard of parents feeling sympathy for an adult male teacher having sex with an underage girl? Well? In general, pay attention to various media for this: when an adult male has sex with an underage person, it's rape, or sexual abuse. When an adult female has sex with an underage boy, it's called "seduction" or just "had sex with". Rarely is it called unambiguously and clearly rape when a women is the suspect. Now where are the feminists to call out on this inequality? You won't hear them because true equality is not in their interest. After decades it should be clear by now I feel. But there's more going on with this article.
The article doesn't tell you is that the police let her go when she was caught red handed. She was ordered to report in after criticism towards police the next day! Now imagine if it were a man caught red handed... you think they'd let him go to ask him to report in some other day? Not a single feminist voice was raised against this. What's new.
Sometimes details alone would give a hint on disingenuous behavior. Let's take a look at his woman, Anita Sarkeesian. She has a popular feminist oriented channel on YouTube called FeministFrequency. First of all, this link: Lego for girls is bad she says
Basically she spends two video's rambling about how Lego Friends is way too girly and is stereotyping genders. At the same time, look at Sarkeesian closely: a pink hoodie sweater, perfectly done facial make up, lipstick, pefectly shaped eyebrows, impressive earrings. And last but not least, her girlie way of communicating. By the way, Lego did their research well considering the salesresults: Triples sales to girls
Now more about Sarkeesian. Look at her peformance on TEDx: Sakreesian on TEDxWomen 2012
Observe her closely. You think she's a genuine person? Also, the audience was an all female audience. And the thing she's talking about is a big scheme of hers. Look it up on YouTube. She has been nicely exposed. Also take a peek at the rest of her videos on her YouTube channel; the constant raising of her eyebrows, crunching of her forehead, like a spoiled sixteen year old girl talking. She's 100% fake. A few pictures to illustrate this:
|Complaining about feminine toys but observe her perfectly done make-up.|
Her forehead and the usual girlie-ish drama poses:
|Always dramatized. Observe raised eyebrows, crunched forehead.|
(To be continued, article isn't finished yet...)