Feminism Is Not a Just Cause

Introduction

There's always space for Womens Rights Activism just like there's space for mens right activism and other special interest groups. This blog-entry is about me questioning the implementation of feminism these days.

Feminism is Hate and Inequality

I believe that feminism is not about equality between men and women, but about female rights only. It's about women having more rights than men, or equal rights as men, but with less obligations. I never heard feminist movements complain if women gained more privileges than men in some field. And then there are hate sites like Jezebel.com. I can't imagine a women who's truly empowered, or has the ability to be so, needs "support" from those kind of websites. Here are a few links which demonstrate the ugly faces of feminism.

Obstructing Freedom of Speech in the University of Toronto by Feminists

Feminism's violent bigots, in response to Warren Farrell's attempt to present a lecture on the growing crisis for boys in public education, as per YouTube's upload comment. The video is somewhat dramatized, but make no mistake, it's not exaggerated. If you like to see the full footage, which I think is far better anyway, then watch this five minute clip: full version of obstructing access.

Let me break it down for you, the reader who may be less informed.

Warren Farrel, A Ph.D , M.A. and B.A. and a champion for Mens Right Activism and former feminist. He visited the University of Toronto to address issues with men and boys in our society. In the video you hear some yelling about him being a rape apologist and upholding a rape culture. These door-blocking students were referring to an out-of-context placed quotes about rape, amongst others. Here's an example, then you be the judge of that: And with the rape, I was showing why the rape statistics are exaggerated, and saying that date rape was much more complex than the way feminists had portrayed it, as men oppressing women.

You will notice that putting things out of context is one of the modus operandi of feminist groups. For Farrel's response, see this link. I could go on forever about this, but let me wrap it up with two more links so you can decide for yourself on what the heck is going on in this world:

Canadian Association For Equality (CAFE) response

Now compare with this link and you tell me if you really think it's a genuine response: The University of Toronto Student's Union (UTSU) published a response to the protest here: http://utsu.ca/content/3316

The UTSU's response, to their obstructing of the entrance, starts off emotionally charged by stating: "On November 16, 2012 a group at the University of Toronto hosted an event on campus which would supposedly address issues that men and boys face in our society."

Now what else would Dr. Farrel do other than having his speech? It's what he does all the time. He's having speeches, is a tutor and organizes workshops. In fact, looking at this resume, the man has an impressive record.

OK, enough of this. On to the next link.

A self proclaimed professional Feminist

 A self proclaimed professional feminist. She said so in the video. The guy presents a lot of statistics, and how does this professional feminist respond? She admits she doesn't care about the statistics. Like she says in the video, she leaves the statistics up to others. The very first question one may ask does she presents her "facts" if she's not interested in statistics? If you can, watch the whole video an dfind out how: by appeals to emotion and a few other cheap tactics, which are called fallacies. For the full break down of what went down see this link: UCL debate on MRM. 

Just about everything stereotypical feminist-like happens, including somebody calling "rape" in the midst of all that. Crying "rape" is a major modus operandi of feminists. There's almost no discussion possible without some feminist crying rape. No man wants to be associated with that, so feminists use it as a way to weaken men by making them feel uncomfortable. You don't have to believe me, all I ask is to open your eyes. You'll see.

Next link.

Cisca Dresselhuys

Cisca Dresselhuys, once the head editor of Dutch feminist magazine "Opzij" (Dutch wordplay on "move aside / for her"). She refused male employers in the company. Offcourse, all references on their website about this case has been removed: C.D.'s response for refusing men as employees

I guess it's cool to be a male feminist but they cannot pluck the fruits, like working for a feminist magazine. Right.

 

 Or how about French feminist movement outrage when the name of the false accuser of Strauss-kahn was made publicly known. (Nafissatou Diallo) Blind love for women. That's what counts for them. 

She knows.

I could post endless links like these. Feel free to try it yourself. Once you're warmed up an entirely new world will open up for you.

OK, let's demonstrate double standards.

Female teacher caught having sex with boy

Did you read it? What odd thing did you notice? Parents feel sympathy for that woman! Ever heard of parents feeling sympathy for an adult male teacher having sex with an underage girl? Well? In general, pay attention to various media for this: when an adult male has sex with an underage person, it's rape, or sexual abuse. When an adult female has sex with an underage boy, it's called "seduction" or just "had sex with". Rarely is it called unambiguously and clearly rape when a women is the suspect. Now where are the feminists to call out on this inequality? You won't hear them because true equality is not in their interest. After decades it should be clear by now I feel. But there's more going on with this article.

The article doesn't tell you is that the police let her go when she was caught red handed. She was ordered to report in after criticism towards police the next day! Now imagine if it were a man caught red handed... you think they'd let him go to ask him to report in some other day? Not a single feminist voice was raised against this. What's new.

Sometimes details alone would give a hint on disingenuous behavior. Let's take a look at his woman, Anita Sarkeesian. She has a popular feminist oriented channel on YouTube called FeministFrequency. First of all, this link: Lego for girls is bad she says

Basically she spends two video's rambling about how Lego Friends is way too girly and is stereotyping genders. At the same time, look at Sarkeesian closely: a pink hoodie sweater, perfectly done facial make up, lipstick, pefectly shaped eyebrows, impressive earrings. And last but not least, her girlie way of communicating. By the way, Lego did their research well considering the salesresults: Triples sales to girls

Now more about Sarkeesian. Look at her peformance on TEDx: Sakreesian on TEDxWomen 2012

Observe her closely. You think she's a genuine person? Also, the audience was an all female audience. And the thing she's talking about is a big scheme of hers. Look it up on YouTube. She has been nicely exposed. Also take a peek at the rest of her videos on her YouTube channel; the constant raising of her eyebrows, crunching of her forehead, like a spoiled sixteen year old girl talking. She's 100% fake. A few pictures to illustrate this:
 

Complaining about feminine toys but observe her perfectly done make-up.

Her forehead and the usual girlie-ish drama poses:

Always dramatized. Observe raised eyebrows, crunched forehead.

(To be continued, article isn't finished yet...)

Michio Kaku - a celebrity wannabe whore

Introduction

Boy am I going to regret the title someday. Maybe. Right now I can't find a more suitable and to-the-point title. Basically I'm saying this man is willing to sell the biggest bullshit for a little bit of fame.

Funding Science

Usually professors are responsible to find funds for research. One way to scoop the money in is by making their field of expertise popular and relevant (= promises for great things) so the nation is going to fund the research. Why do you think NASA is sending out some worthless message about possible life on Mars every two weeks? It's to keep the public warm so NASA can continue to ask for funds. But if you listen carefully they haven't offered us anything yet. It's all very vague until now. Something tells me it will stay this way forever.

To Michio Kaku fanboys: I have added a scientific explanation of  "forever". Follow this link: Foreverrrrr 

Now about the String Theory. That's the biggest scam ever. The String Theory is about a smallest particle of energy in the form of a string. It implies the existence of multiple dimensions, which in turn leaves us with  most hardcore scientific formulas. These formulas are so difficult to understand, only a very few know what it says. Uhum. Those are very important formulas because they offer the Theory Of Everything! Yep. Not even the most bad ass wizardry in Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter dared to go that far. But String Theory scientsts found it.

But wait, it turns out the theoretical models raise unsolvable problems. So they added more dimensions to their story. And later even more dimensions. And now, they even have entire parallel universes. Multiverses! With 11 dimensions. Each time they couldn't figure out the problem they added more dimensions. That's the trick. And so the formulas - which seem to have an elegancy beyond imaginable borders - became more complex as well. It's all fascinating really, multiple universes to solve everything (e v e r y t h i n g !) because it's the Theory of Everything, remember? And so nations keep on giving money and in fact up to 80% of the science budgets went to String Theory research. Talking about one big scam. Tell me if you think a bigger scam could compete with this. Feel free to include Madoff.

Michio Kaku Fights Ineffective Science

Luckily we have Michio Kaku to stop all this nonsense because he stated once how he's critical about some of the cost-ineffective missions and methods of NASA. Oops I was wrong. Michio Kaku is the biggest endorser of the String Fairy Tale. But then again, he's the co-writer of this fantasy story. Yep, the co-founder. This should be enough to be suspicious already but now the real work starts.

Signals To Outer Space

In the documentary "Through the Wormhole" episode "Will We Survive First Contact?" we learn that NASA is searching for Extraterrestrial Life by scanning the universe for certain patterns in certain frequencies. Enter M.K. He claims NASA is doing it wrong because they are not scanning a broad aspect of frequences. And then he makes an example so Rednecks would understand too: by standing on a bridge taking photographs of cars passing by. Then he asks us: would we find the alien if we would only take pictures this way on this spot? I bet all the scientific wannabe sheeple are like: "Noooo offcourse not. Stupid NASA. We are so much more efficient because we understand what the Great Michio Kaku is saying.".

Bambi versus Godzilla

For some reason Michio Kaku is allowed to say more stuff in the same episode. He tells us not to believe Hollywood movies (good thing he's telling us that) because they protray as if Earth will have an all out war against Aliens. Like, a fair battle. No says M.K., it will be more like Bambi vs Godzilla! (add convincing tone and amazement for the dramatic effect). Something tells me even Rednecks and wannabees (the target audience) could have guessed this.

Michio Explains the String Theory (not)

Have you seen this YouTube video of him explaining the String Theory to idiots uninformed human beings? Here's the link: Idiot Guide to String Bullsh*t.

First of all the entire four minutes are about travel through wormholes. What the String Theory really is isn't explained at all. It's only slightly touched at best. Here's the cool part: at 2:23: we are shown some formula with only the smallest amount of vague context and without an explanation of the formula. It's obviously meant to impress us with the sheer complexity of it. And at 3:54 mark we're shown the same formula again without any explanation and - this time - no context whatsoever. But if that formula doesn't impress you then I don't know what will. The Theory of Everything is right there at your disposal.

Michio Knows About Radiation Too. He's Such a Genius LOL!

So Fukushima had this Nuclear Reactor thing going on. A very sad story for many out there. Aside from the immediate drama there was this isssue on how to handle the situation with the reactor in general. Michio appeard on ABC and was perfectly able to tell:

1. What to do
2. Japanese Suck

 First he was telling how the reactor should be burried (or something) and then he was telling how the Japanese leadership weren't real scientist because they have fallen asleep. Here's the exact quote:

“The leadership [in Japan] is disconnected from reality. They’re not physicists, they’re not engineers… ” -Michio Kaku,  CNN, March 18, 2011

Luckily we have mr. Kaku to tell the Japanese what to do.

And there's the usual fear mongering, the thing he's really good at (just observe how often he's telling us how the Aliens will crush us!):

“Plutonium is the most toxic chemical known to science! A speck of plutonium, a millionth of a gram, could cause cancer if it’s ingested.”  -Michio Kaku, ABC News, March 25,2011

A second of sun tanning can cause cancer too. No context whatsoever. But most viewers by far won't know how to look at his statement and find the flaws. All they know is that Kaku is some smart sicentist with wormholes and Theory of Everything which makes travel from verse to verse possible. Then surely he must know stuff about something as puny as your everyday average nuclear reactor?

Michio Is Expert At Evolution Theory. The man knows all.

Watch the vid at the 2:32 mark and then let's talk: I Pretend To Be An Evolution Theory Expert

So he doesn't think Evolution has stopped but (wait for it...) "grrosse evolution" has stopped. Grosse as in, our brains are not getting bigger, and other physical features. An no, it's not terminology. Mr. Kaku invented it. "Grosse Evolution". Isaac Asimov would be proud.

But he has a solution (was there a problem?). Gene manipulation. Now we cannot create a pig with wings yet - "that would require the manipulation of thousands of genes, we simply don't have that technology yet" - so chances are that we would look decades from now the same.

I'm not making this shit up man. Just watch that short clip.

“... so chances are, decades from now, we'll look pretty much the same.” -Michio Kaku,  YouTube May 31, 2011 (from bigthink.com)

Find any spoiled 12 year old girl who's major achievement is clicking the "Like Button" on Facebook and she'd predict the same if you ask her.

Michio Kaku Knows Everything About Everything

He sure is acting like he does. He knows everything about everything. He knows how the future would look like (he's a futurist too), he knows how the universe is built up, he even knows there are multiple universes, he knows about evolution, he knows about gene technology and manipulation, he knows about the military strength of aliens, he knows better how to scan for alien signals then NASA signal experts, he knows about radiation and how to handle nuclear reactor incidents. The only thing he does not know how is how to prevent shit coming from his mouth. He should find some funds to research how to do that. This man has the world nothing to offer.

Not Just This

I could have gone on and on about him and his antics. Clearly I'm not his biggest fan. Just look up all his material on YouTube (it's about 99% of all YouTube material because he likes attention so much) and you tell me if you genuinly really really really learned something for reals. Be honest.  Until then...

Movie Review: Prometheus

The Prometheus Trailers gave a hint already: much ado about nothing. The music score tried to depict immense fear but onscreen only action was to be seen. Nothing scary. Music and action were not in sync and this is your hint about how to movie was gonig to be: one dimensional. It's all about the exterior.

Sure the visual effects were stunning. And that's where the good things end.

The movie asks big questions about who made us, where did we come from and why do our creators want to destroy us. Turns out we were created by aliens. The aliens noticed how humanity was messing things up so they sent Jezus (says Ridley Scott) but as everybody knows the Jews killed Jezus. So the aliens, our creaters called the "Engineers" got pissed of at humanity and now they want to kill us because we're not worthy. The movie didn't show that. We only know this because of an interview with the director. Just like everything in this movie. No answers are given at all. All answers are coming from interviews.

So we were made by the Engineers: a perfect shaped white humanoid who drank some spacegoo which will desintegrate the engineers into the smallest particles of a DNA structure. From there on life starts to evolve. The same spacegoo appears later in the movie again, but this time it has lost its color. It's all black. I suppose the state of the goo represents the state of things as they are. In the movie we could see multiple murals: the perfect Engineer and something which we all recognize as an Alien from Alien. I think the mural depicted what could happen if the spacegoo is used wrong (or something). As promised, no answers are given. Drinking the goo means that the goo will do whatever the hell it wants to do with the person who drank it. So I guess when good creatures drink it good things happen. And if bad creatures or creatures with no soul (a worm) drink it bad things will happen. Offcourse we won't learn anything nor do we learn where that goo came from.

The movie has so many plotholes, cop outs and weak scripts in it, I don't know how to continue. How about this one. Our protagonist, Noomi Rapace, is up and running after some form of a cesarian through the muscles of her belly in a matter of minutes. Seconds! Offcourse, she stumbles a bit and is in pain now and then (lol) but that's it. Also, as I'm ranting about Nooni, some compare her with role of Sigourney Weaver, being the strong woman - the strongest of them all. Well let me tell you this: Nooni is from the era of Snooki, Lana Del Rey and Ke$ha. Sigourney is from the era of Marlon Brando, Woody Allen, Fellini, to name a few. Nooni doesn't even come close topping her. The comparison made by some is a plain joke.

And now Guy Pearce.

Guy Pierce make up. Convincing? Without stunning CGI and 3D moments directors can't make a Science Fiction or a Fantasy movie anymore. This picture is one of the few released pictures of him portraying an old Weyland. Trust me, in the movie the make up looks much cheaper!

Charlize Theron as Weylands daughter and high ranking official on board of the ship Prometheus. She was only there to reinforce the concept of young-replacing-old. By one sentence. Other than that she only took up space for eighty percent of the movie. She died by running away from a crashing space ship. She couldn't think of stepping sideways...
Too bad because this actress has a lot to offer potentially. Sadly enough directors give her one dimensional characters to play. I'm convinced she would have been a much better new "strong woman" then Nooni. But imagine Hollywood making a blonde smart, strong and winning. That's way too daring for them.






Charlize Theron: potential, but was never given a soul in movies she was in.

Micheal Fassbinder was there too. He played a robot. And he rocked. Again. He was the only one who could read the Engineers writings on the wall. Strangely enough the scientists never asking him what those writings said. Like everything in the movie, for every good little thing there was a big bad thing.

I'll continue later. It drains me writing about this stupid cheap cop out movie. Until then.

Skyrim is a Major Dissapointment

So like thirty minutes ago I uninstalled Skyrim. The amount of crashes were horrible. The framerates went down and down despite my high end machine. And finally, the cherry on top, just when I had the hang of every aspect of the game, being a High Elf level 30, I couldn't load the most recent savegames.

Yes, I had the latest patch 1.5. Yes I tried the orignal version and some mods for high definition graphix. It all worked OK-ish in the beginning but the stability of the game went from mediocre to unplayable. The maker, Bethesda Game Studios didn't learn anything from their previous versions like Oblivion. Many of these bugs were also to be seen in the Fallout releases. Fallout is made and produced by the same company.

For Bathesda, making their games playable just enough is good enough for them. There isn't much competition. They know. There isn't much competition when it comes to high quality Role Playing Games. At my age, 44, I know RPG's of these days are a joke compared to what has been. Young 18 to 24 year old players think this is the creme de la creme, along with Oblivion and Fallout. Well, today with these standards - high graphix and neat sounds - it is. A good story line and consequent use of logic and cleverness in general is rarely to be seen.

It's not merely the crashing and lack of performance this game suffers. Story wise, whatever your main character does, it just doesn't have consequences. I can murder persons for the ego of others. I'll receive my XP. I can kill the director of an orphanage, leave the children behind. But I'll get my XP. There's no evil, good or neutral. Just kill kill kill for the XP. No consequences.

The game looks non-linear but it isn't. In the long run you just can't go wrong. You'll be directed towards the expected end one way or the other. There is one major plotline (quest) to do and many other side quests. You can do anything in any order almost. This gives a false feeling of non-linear gameplay. However, every quests is basically a stand alone quest with a linear approach. I did like 40 quests. They all look the same. Kill that, bring this, activate so. Seen it done it.

And finally, the acting voices. I hear the same voices for all kinds of characters throughout the world of Skyrim. It feels like they only have 4 voice actors. At one point I didn't buy it anymore. At one point, I didn't buy anything.

And then there's the battles. It's a plain joke. If I would to use everything I had I'd be more lurking in my inventory and magic screens then watching and enjoying the view of the battle and the game. I'm stunned Bathesda didn't hear of hotbars, quickkeys and whatnot. Sure, it offers a quick menu but the items in that menu are ungrouped. I had potions, offensive spells, healing spells, weaons and armor all mixed up in the quick menu because the game doesn't allow any structured setup of your stuff.
So I decided to level up my archery and conjuring an destruction spells only  and used only these three things throughout the game. Boring! Simplistic UI design.

Games like Skyrim are milking a good start (Elder Scrolls). These days it's all about cool graphics and quantity. There aren't many games that specialize in single play. So there's not much competition. But the young of these days don't know any better. They think that the modding community is an integral part of all this. The modding community who will make these kind of games much more interesting. Remember the Desert Combat mod for Battlefield 1942? In fact, many players don't even look at the game primarily. They look for modding options... and downloadable content... Now that's saying something.

Lurking the internet learns that many more players gave up on this game. The crashes along with decreasing rendering performance and various other nasty bugs makes this game unplayable for many of us. But nobody has an interest in finding out the percentage of very unsatisfied customers.

But as long as games like this are being hyped Bathesda won't have a reason to improve their products in a significant way.

Hypersensitivity Is Not Normal

There's something wrong with being a Hypersensitive Person (HSP). There's something wrong with the definition of hypersensitivy as well.

This is what a Hypersensitive Person is according to Elaine N. Aron:

• Are you easily overwhelmed by such things as bright lights, strong smells, coarse fabrics, or sirens nearby?
• Do you get rattled when you have a lot to do in a short amount of time?
• Do you make a point of avoiding violent movies and TV shows?
• Do you need to withdraw during busy days, into bed or a darkened room or some other place where you can have privacy and relief from the situation?
• Do you make it a high priority to arrange your life to avoid upsetting or overwhelming situations?
• Do you notice or enjoy delicate or fine scents, tastes, sounds, or works of art?
• Do you have a rich and complex inner life?
• When you were a child, did your parents or teachers see you as sensitive or shy?

So the first item is of a physical nature (senses) and the rest are traits of an emotional or behavioural nature. Let's dissect this list a bit.

Overwhelmed by bright lights? Looking straight in the sun is never a good idea without sunglasses. So what does that question exactly entail? Being overwhelmed by sirens nearby could easely be the same as being overwhelmed by any (loud) traffic sounds or any loud sounds in general. It might be sign of stress. In fact, one of the self test questions on E.A's website is about being overwhelmed by strong sensory input in general. If one combines it with being startled easely, can't cope with increased workload, can't cope with emotions then this clearly is a serious signal of stress.

Everything else in this list fits any normal person. Do you enjoy delicate or fine scents, tastes or sounds? Are you sensitive or shy (really?) ? Do you have a rich and complex inner life? All these items have nothing to do with hypersensitivity! Traits of a typical introvert are combined with traits of a stressed person.

Let's observe the self test questions a bit further. Questions like "I try hard to avoid making mistakes or forgetting things." This question could typically fit a perfectionist.

Or how about repeating questions in a different form:

• I am easily overwhelmed by strong sensory input.
• I am easily overwhelmed by things like bright lights, strong smells,coarse fabrics,or sirens close by.
• I am made uncomfortable by loud noises.
• I am bothered by intense stimuli, like loud noises or chaotic scenes.

Scoring 14 out of 27 questions means you're probably a HSP. But with these kind of questions, as posted above, it's easy to get 14 postives.

How perfect this has been done to conceal weaknesses. It's the same as combining the flu with normal healthy human traits only to claim that there's nothing wrong with you. You just need to be aware of who you are so you can cope with it. Wrong! The real answer is that you're a normal person with a disease: the flu! So you need medicin.

The truth is that many (good) traits of introvert personality types, are mixed with stress-related behaviour, only to call such a a person a Highly Senstive Person. Remove the good traits of those introverts and then all that is left is a psychological and/or neurasthenic disorder. The so called HSP counselors are earning money with patients who are either in denial, uninformed, or patients who are unstable at that moment. That's the truth which many won't accept. And the governments allow it. Madness.

Dear Cigarette

I'll  have none of you as of today. It's on bitch.

Day 01: flunked an exam. Geez, nice going there, abandoning you on the day of an exam. But the events are a fact, there's nothing I can change. I move on. Thinking of you every 15 minutes. Fear of being a loser holds me in check. Repulsion keeps me in check. Today I win.

Day 02: Still thinking about you every 15 minutes or so. The repulsion of my image in the mirror holding you keeps me in check.
Oh what the heck. Just came from outside. My house didn't have this smell of your perfume.
Also, I feel very lethargic. Should have gone to the tanning bed salon and should have cleaned my house. Did neither of them. Let's take a very long shower en end this evening. I wonder how day 3 will go. I feel strong. I feel good. This day I win again.

Day 03: All too easy. Goodnight day 03.
Day 04: Didn't sleep well I think. I was lethargic and tired all day.  Goodnight day 04.
Day 05: Relaxed day. Smooth going. Still thinking about you every 15 minutes or so but easy to resist.
Day 06: I was short of breath a bit for a few days. Seems now to be over. It's a normal reaction by the way. And so day 06 ends with another clear victory for me.
Day 07: A full week without the smoke. Friggin awesome.
Day 08: No challenge whatsoever. Boring.
Day 09: Sigh. It's not a big of a challenge. Sure, my mind is thinking of you but I can handle it.
Day 10: Whatever. Another day gone.
Day 11: Slept the day away, took a long shower, good dinner and off I go to bed again. LOL.
Day 12: Another day bites the dust.
Day 13: Quit smoking is boring isn't it? LOL.

It's over three weeks now. There's nothing to report. Quitting smoking is easier then I thought. It's boring so I won't add much to this blog anymore.

Almost into the fifth week. Still going strong.

Over seven weeks now. Quitting seems easy for me. I'm nog going to update this blog entry anymore unless something really interesting happens. INTJ's are said to be strong self motivators. Well if this isn't some impressive indication then I don't know what is.

October 2012. Not smoking. Gained 10 Kg (about 20 Lbs) of weight. No suit fits me anymore! Replaced my Jeans too. No custom made Italian shirt fits me either. Too expensive to replace just like that. And I have a belly too now! But women tell me I look better. More color, fuller face. But then again, I always was an ugly motherfucker.

April 2013. Smoking wise, things are still going dandy. However, the thought of smoking never leaves my brain. I realize I belong to the very rare who managed to quit this successfully, cold turkey without help, but I also realize I have to remain vigilant. It may be that for the rest of my life occasionally I have to resist. Sometimes I can even smell the smoke even though there's nothing here.

Who's Vladimir?

Forcing a smile whilst having the morning sunlight in my eyes

Somebody with a Dutch mind and a Serb heart. Born on 08 october 1967. Moved to the Netherlands when I was six years old. My Serb mother married a Dutch sailor.

I'm self taught. Interested in politics, science and taught myself quantor logic, predicate logic, other parts of mathematics like linear algebra, French, Spanish, software programming, Currently I'm delving into the validity of psychometric tools and staying on top of social and political events.

I enjoy music and movies with some depth or quality in it. I love learning and spending money. Expensive lunches, dinners and travelling. Fashion. And dancing. Ballroom and Latin.

My MBTI type is INTJ. Basically I'm an introvert, (logical) thinker and choose to live organized as opposed to spontaneous. Also sensitive, which doesn't occur all too often with this type, so it seems.

Single, no children. I'd love to have a dog but being single prevents me from getting me one. I love dogs. I love learning random things too. I need it.

I love people when they drop their masks - their shields they built up over the past decades. For that, the fate of the world, of humanity is my biggest concern. The never ending attacks on freedom of speech, even in modern parts of the world, the constant killing of people asking for freedom and equality, the rapes, the tortures, the plundering, and the lack of the free West to do something about it, these things are constantly on my mind and there's nothing I can do.

Allergic to politicians, total indescretion, untended appearance, lack of respect and panicy behaviour.

Vladimir Bosnjak